WMOC 2010

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Annual championship
  • Orienteering runners
  • Competition
  • Qualification runs
  • Cash

WMOC 2010

Header Banner

WMOC 2010

  • Home
  • Annual championship
  • Orienteering runners
  • Competition
  • Qualification runs
  • Cash
Competition
Home›Competition›Creek Road Miners (CRKR) vs Competition Head to Head Analysis

Creek Road Miners (CRKR) vs Competition Head to Head Analysis

By Debbie Fitzgerald
May 21, 2022
0
0

Creek Road Miners (OTCMKTS:CRKR – Get Rating) is one of 34 public companies in the “amusement and recreation services” sector, but how does it compare to its competitors? We will compare Creek Road Miners to related companies based on the strength of its analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

Valuation and benefits

This table compares the revenue, earnings per share (EPS), and valuation of Creek Road Miners and its competitors.

Gross revenue Net revenue Price/earnings ratio
Creek Road Miners $810,000.00 -$17.27 million -0.53
Creek Road Miners competitors $914.79 million -75.39 million dollars 56.93

Creek Road Miners’ competitors have higher revenues, but lower revenues than Creek Road Miners. Creek Road Miners trades at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than its competitors, indicating that it is currently more affordable than other companies in its industry.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

25.0% of the shares of Creek Road Miners are held by institutional investors. In comparison, 34.0% of the shares of all “Amusement and recreation services” companies are held by institutional investors. 83.2% of the shares of Creek Road Miners are held by insiders. In comparison, 29.4% of the shares of all Amusement and Leisure Services companies are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership indicates that hedge funds, endowments, and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

Creek Road Miners has a beta of 0.44, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, competitors Creek Road Miners have a beta of -0.49, indicating that their average stock price is 149% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of the current recommendations for Creek Road Miners and its competitors, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sales Ratings Hold odds Buy reviews Strong buy odds Rating
Creek Road Miners 0 0 0 0 N / A
Creek Road Miners competitors 73 270 379 ten 2.45

As a group, “amusement and recreation services” companies have an upside potential of 66.51%. Since Creek Road Miners’ competitors have higher upside potential, analysts clearly believe that Creek Road Miners has less favorable growth aspects than its competitors.

Profitability

This table compares the net margins, return on equity and return on assets of Creek Road Miners and its competitors.

Net margins Return on equity return on assets
Creek Road Miners -1,753.50% N / A -222.24%
Creek Road Miners competitors -2,733.84% -2.38% -207.36%

Summary

Creek Road Miners beats its competitors on 5 of the 9 factors compared.

Creek Road Miners Company Profile (Get a rating)

Creek Road Miners, Inc. is in the cryptocurrency mining business. The company was formerly known as Wizard Brands, Inc. and changed its name to Creek Road Miners, Inc. in July 2021. The company was incorporated in 2001 and is based in Park City, Utah.



Get daily news and reviews for Creek Road Miners – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of breaking news and analyst ratings for Creek Road Miners and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s free daily email newsletter.

Related posts:

  1. Oman: publication of the competition law enforcement regulations
  2. Takeover Abandoned After Concerns Raised About Removing Competition
  3. New Brunswick athletes balance competition and isolation in pursuit of Tokyo Games
  4. Winner of the student wall competition to implement the design

Categories

  • Annual championship
  • Cash
  • Competition
  • Orienteering runners
  • Qualification runs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions